Convert strategy decisions into owned commitments.
The closing module of the strategy workshop. Participants convert the day's decisions into a set of specific, named commitments: who does what, by when, and what success looks like. This is the moment where strategy becomes intention.

Strategy sessions regularly produce insight without commitment. Participants leave energised, but three weeks later nothing has changed because no one was clear about who was responsible for what, or when the first checkpoint would be. This module is designed to close that gap.
The distinction between commitments and actions matters. An action is a task. A commitment is a promise made in front of a group, connected to a specific strategic choice, with a clear owner and deadline. The social dimension of making the commitment visible and shared increases the likelihood of follow-through significantly. Research on implementation intentions, developed by psychologist Peter Gollwitzer, shows that linking intended behaviour to a specific when, where and how makes it substantially more likely to occur.
This module draws that discipline into the strategy conversation. Each strategic choice from the Strategic Intent session should generate at least one named commitment. The commitments are reviewed as a set before the session closes, to test whether they collectively add up to something that would move the strategy forward, or whether they are a set of isolated tasks with no coherent logic.
For team-level sessions, the commitments should connect explicitly to the wider organisational strategy: how does this team's plan contribute to the direction that has been set above? This is the point at which the team's strategy is tested for alignment, and any gaps become visible.

Have each person write down the most important thing they personally need to do differently, decide, or take responsibility for, then capture the commitments visibly and test whether they add up. Agree a review date before anyone leaves the room.
Ask each person to write privately: given everything discussed today, what is the most important thing I personally need to do differently, decide, or take responsibility for? They write one or two specific commitments, each with a clear timeline. Then go around the room, with each person naming their commitments while you capture them visibly: name, commitment, and deadline. Check for completeness, so that each of the day's key strategic choices has at least one named owner, and if any choice is left without a commitment, name that explicitly.
Look at the full set of commitments together. Do they add up to something that would actually move the strategy forward, or are they concentrated in one area while another is neglected, and are they specific enough to hold someone to account? Sharpen any that need it before the session closes. Then agree as a group when progress will be reviewed and who is responsible for keeping the commitments visible and flagging when something is at risk, setting a specific date before leaving the room, with a thirty-day check-in as the default. Close by naming what has been decided: the external pressures the group has agreed to respond to, the strategic choices made explicit, and the commitments that will move those choices forward.
Use Strategic Commitments to close a strategy session. Each person turns the day's decisions into a specific, named commitment with an owner, a deadline and a definition of success, so the work becomes intention rather than a set of good ideas.

Using this tool with a skilled facilitator means that discussions are focused, time is used efficiently, and the group moves toward consensus, making the session productive and impactful.